Online Peer To Peer Poker

Poker peer to peer. How do I claim my Welcome Bonus? One more recent development is the introduction of mobile slots. BRANDON LOPEZ: SUN BURNS OUT YOUR EYES MONDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2019. Experience Slots Era at its most stunning and poker peer to peer most beautiful. We love to be a part of the 1 poker peer to peer of Us Annual fundraising event.

< Wikipedia:Peer review
Peer to peer video streaming
  • Mar 14, 2018  Peer-to-peer interactive games where players compete directly against other players, like poker. Non-peer-to-peer interactive games where players compete against the dealer’s hand, which simulate table games. Non-peer-to-peer interactive games which simulate slot machines.
  • A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for April 2009.This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I see it.

Poker Face (Lady Gaga song)[edit]

Article(edit | visual edit | history)·Article talk(edit | history)·Watch • Watch peer review
  • A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for April 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Wind creek casino montgomery hours. I've listed this article for peer review because I see it as a potential candidate for a GA. I'd really appreciate a great copyediting and some general ideas to improve the article (I can deal with the specifics). Thanks in advance, -- Atalk/contribs 17:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments from Underneath-it-All (talk·contribs)
  • The first time a country is mentioned its proper name should be written. UK → United Kingdom.
Done. --Legolas(talk2me) 09:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Remain consistent. Either use USA or U.S.
Done. --Legolas(talk2me) 09:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • The citation in the 'Track listings' section seems odd and out of place. Also, maybe catalog numbers could be added to the section?
Done. --Legolas(talk2me) 10:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Publishing information should be added to citations.
Done wherever possible. --Legolas(talk2me) 10:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Peer
  • The line '..the rest of the European countries' in the lead seems awkward. Which European countries?
Done. Changed to many other European countries. --Legolas(talk2me) 10:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • For such a popular song there should be many more critical reviews. Were all the reviews positive? If there are some negative reviews I would add them to the article for balance.
Done. Though all the RS had the song as mostly positive. Only negative review I found was at Digital Spy and Sputnikmusic but they were removed as not noteworthy.--Legolas(talk2me) 09:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Efbet online casino bg. Comments by Realist2

I have the article a clean up, but the following references need replacing because there are unreliable sources.

  • http://video.aol.com/video-detail/lady-gaga-poker-face-live-jimmy-kimmel/3940120997 (Video doesn't assert notability of event)
  • http://video.aol.com/video-detail/gaga-poker-face-acappella/144560656/?icid=VIDURVMUS04 same issue

Also, this is interscope.com, not lady gaga.com as mislabeled in the references section

R2 20:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Online Peer To Peer Transfer

Done--Legolas(talk2me) 06:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments:Frcm1988 (talk) 05:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Free Peer To Peer Websites

  • I don't think the countries in the lead should be linked, they are to common geographical places.
  • The composition section dosen't seem to be correct in some parts. The sheet have it in common time not compound
  • The metronome is the instrument that measures the beats. I believe the correct word is tempo.
  • The song is written in the key of A minor, 'which is typically used in songs with dark undertones', do you have a source for this.
  • The next part: The song begins with a medium tempo followed by electronic chord arrangement and drums which anticipates the lyrics to follow. The opening chords and the melody emphasize the tonic of the leading notes: Am---F♭---G♭---Am---F♭-G♭. This is followed by the sound of dance music, produced by a powerful beat from the instruments and a stuttering hook following the chorus, seems like a copy of the composition section of the 'Papa Don't Preach' article. The sheet music dosen't have this, so this fails under original reaserch.
  • In the sample you wrote 'which plays the chorus, where Gaga's voice spans from G3 to C5', how do you know her voice spans that range in the chorus, according to the sheet music that range is for the entire song not only the chorus.
  • Online magazines and reviewers like Allmusic and Popmatters don't go italicised.
  • This sentence: Gaga became the first artist since Madonna's 2006 single 'Sorry', I think is odd, it sounds like Sorry is the artist.
  • You have to be consisted with the numbers in the chart performance, for example you have: debuted at number thirty and the song debuted at number 41, choose only one format.
  • The countries listed for Europe should be in alphabeticall order.
  • I think the succession boxes are too long, it should be trimed down. There is no need to have every chart listed.
  • I don't know if this is a requierement for GA, but the references need to be corrected. Many of them have the wrong names, for example 'Lady Gaga throws off Silbermond from the top', I couldn't find it in the article, the correct one is 'Swiss Singles Top 100: Issue Date: Sunday March 15th, 2009.
  • Some of the publishers are incorrect too, for example the BBC is not the publisher for the UK Singles Chart, is the The Official Charts Company.
Done--Legolas(talk2me) 06:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

The formatting of references is quite shaky. Dates should be (October 25, 2008) for the publishing date and 'Retrieved on October 25, 2008' for the retrieve date. Check to the italics on publishers. Websites, news channels usually aren't in italics. Magazines, newspapers, books usually are. You also need to remove the image of her performing life. Absolutely no fair use rational would be sufficient to support that particular image of a living person. — R2 09:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Peer_review/Poker_Face_(Lady_Gaga_song)/archive1&oldid=284385320'
Peer to peer video streaming
< Wikipedia:Peer review

2009 World Series of Poker Europe[edit]

Toolbox
  • automated tips (more info)
Article(edit | visual edit | history)·Article talk(edit | history)·Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm hoping to turn it into a featured list like 2007 WSOPE and 2008 WSOPE and ultimately make World Series of Poker Europe a featured topic.

Thanks, Rymatz (talk) 12:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort is located approximately 118 miles from Alpena. Regarded as one of the best Casinos in Alpena area, Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort is located at 6800 E Soaring Eagle Blvd. You can reach them at (989) 775-5777. https://graphicnin5.netlify.app/is-there-a-casino-near-alpena-mi.html.

Ruhrfisch comments: Thanks for your work on this article. I recently peer reviewed the 1973 WSOP, and found the contrast between the two articles quite interesting. I do not think this currently meets FLC requirements, so here are some suggestions for improvement.

  • I often start a peer review by saying a model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow. You have already done that with the FLs for the two previous WSOP events, but I have to say that I think the model is flawed and that this does not meet the MOS and FLC requirements.
  • I think the lead does not follow WP:LEAD. For example the first sentence says nothing about this specific 2009 tournament (it would be a fine first sentence for a general article on the WSOPE). WP:LEAD says in part (about the first sentence): The article should begin with a declarative sentence telling the nonspecialist reader what (or who) is the subject. This does not do that.
  • In fact the current lead does not even mention the 2009 WSOPE until the fourth paragraph. Now I know that FLs often have larger leads than WP:LEAD would recommend, but I think the lead should focus on the subject of the article (2009 WSOPE) and not wait until the last paragraph to toss in a few facts about the topic. There was much more textual information on the 1973 WSOP in its short article than there is here on the 2009 WSOPE.
  • The current fourth paragraph is a poor summary of the tables of information which make up the body of the article. Let's look at one sentence, on the first of four events: The first event saw J.P. Kelly emerge as the winner of a less-than-an-hour long heads up battle, overcoming a 3-to-1 chip deficit against Fabien Dunlop and earning his second World Series of Poker bracelet of the year. WHen I read this I thought the first event was one game (not sure of what kind of poker) that lasted less than an hour. When I read the table below it tells me it was £1,000 No Limit Hold'em, that there were 608 buy-ins and that the event lasted four calendar days. I think all of this could be in the lead.
  • Similar comparisons can be made for each of the other three events - I would specify the length in days, the number of buy-ins (I assume this is the same as the number of players??)(If not, this needs to be clarified), and the type of poker played.
  • I did an experiment and pasted the first three paragraphs of 2008 World Series of Poker Europe in the place of the first three paragraphs here (without the picture). There was only one change (colon to ndash) between the two. Following a model is a good idea, but copying and pasting that model is not.
  • That said, I would look carefully at the information in the current lead that is not specifically about the 2009 WSOPE and see if it merits inclusion. For example what does this have to do with the 2009 WSOPE? Furthermore, as the laws that govern the age of gambling differ in England than the U.S., the WSOPE admits younger players. In 2007, one of these younger players, 18-year-old Annette 'Annette_15' Obrestad became the youngest player to win a WSOP bracelet event.[5] Were there younger players in 2009 who did well? If so, talk about them, not about what happened two years ago. Similarly, did any of the finalists get there via the online gaming partner? If not, why is such prominence given to the company? Look at each statement and ask yourself how is this relevant to 2009 WSOPE. If it is, keep it somewhere. If not, get rid of it.
  • I would start the lead with the details of the 2009 tournament. Perhaps some overall stats (days long, number of players, total money in buyins and in prizes, total number of events). I then would devote a few sentences to each of the four events. Then and only then would I go into the history and background of the tournament (though I think it would be fine to have a first sentence that mentioned that this was the third year of the WSOPE).
  • If you raise the argument that the 2008 WSOPE FL does not do this, I would say that I think it needs serious work to remain a FL.
  • I also think that the tables could use a few sentences of introduction each. Perhaps briefly explain the games of poker involved. For example did any of the previous WSOPE winners repeat?
  • Sources depend fairly havily on the WSOPE site - are there other, more independent sources available?
  • Please make sure that the existing text includes no copyright violations, plagiarism, or close paraphrasing. For more information on this please see Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches. (This is a general warning given in all peer reviews, in view of previous problems that have risen over copyvios.)

Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch><>°° 22:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Opened for business on June 1st, 2004, the Turlock Poker Room is a great venue for beginner, intermediate and professional players, where small-town friendlienss meets big-time action 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. And sweetening the pot are two different Bad Beat Jackpots! Come in for some great action! Get in the game at the Central Valley's most exciting poker room! Presentation of the Turlock Poker Room. The Turlock Poker Room is located in Turlock, California. It opens 24/7. This establishment offers eight table games: Blackjack, Fortune Pai Gow Poker, Omaha, Texas Hold 'Em, Ultimate Texas Hold 'Em, Three Card Poker, Pure Spanish 21 and Mexican Poker. Poker Room Planning Division Approval by the Planning Commission may be also required. Please contact the Planning Department at (209) 668-5640 for more information. Police Department If you are interested in obtaining a Card Room Employee permit, you must complete an application and submit it to the Records Unit in person. Turlock poker room age limit.

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Peer_review/2009_World_Series_of_Poker_Europe/archive1&oldid=451650481'